AI Governance
Your board will ask how you govern AI. Have an answer in writing.
Health systems are deploying clinical and operational AI faster than they can govern it. Regulators, accreditors, and boards have noticed. Anchor is the auditable system of record for every AI decision your organization makes — risk-tiered, stakeholder-signed, and defensible two years from now when someone asks.
The pressure is converging
Four frameworks now expect health systems to document AI risk classification, ongoing monitoring, and decision trails. Consultants can write a one-time report. They can't be your audit trail.
EU AI Act
High-risk AI in healthcare requires risk management, post-market monitoring, and human oversight records. Penalties scale with global revenue.
HHS AI Assurance
ASTP/ONC HTI-1 mandates transparency and risk management practices for predictive decision support interventions deployed at certified health IT users.
NIST AI RMF
Govern, Map, Measure, Manage. A reference governance program that boards and auditors are increasingly using as the benchmark.
Joint Commission
Responsible Use of Health Data guidance signals that AI governance maturity will become an accreditation question, not a recommendation.
Consulting reports are deliverables. Governance is continuous.
A 12-week engagement gives you a strategy deck and a maturity score. Six months later, the AI inventory is stale, the policy isn't enforced, and the decision trail lives in someone's email. When the regulator, the board, or the plaintiff's attorney asks, you don't have an answer — you have a binder.
Anchor sits where the work happens. Every AI procurement, every risk classification, every stakeholder sign-off lands in one auditable record. The deliverable isn't a report — it's a system of record that's still defensible two years from now.
What Anchor gives your AI governance program
AI system of record
Every model, vendor, and decision in one inventory. Surfaced for the board on demand.
Risk-tiered intake
Classify new AI against EU AI Act / NIST tiers. Route high-risk to governance committee with documented vote.
Stakeholder sign-offs
Timestamped approvals from clinical, compliance, IT, and legal — not buried in email threads.
CARE-R briefs
Board-ready PDF summarizing the decision, the alternatives considered, and the evidence behind each.
Continuous audit trail
Re-open any decision years later with the full history, sign-offs, assumptions, and revisions intact.
Vendor re-assessment
Re-audit AI vendors at renewal against their original claims with a structured workflow.